Home

More About Pathfinder

OSHA Compliance Seminars

MIOSHA Compliance Seminars

OSHA Regulations

OSHA Construction Regulations

MIOSHA Regulations

MIOSHA Construction Regulations

Avian Flu Compliance Compendium

Biohazard Labels

HazCom Labels

HazCom Program

HazCom Training Materials

Bloodborne Pathogens Compliance Compendium

Bloodborne Pathogens Exposure Control Plan

Bloodborne Pathogens Training Materials

Safety & Health News

Free MSDS's

Free Training Programs

Free OSHA Sample Plans

Free MIOSHA Sample Plans

Download the PfA Catalog

Sales Tax Exempt Customers

Michigan Court of Appeals Upholds Guilty Verdict in Worker Fatality Case

On October 17, 2006, the Michigan Court of Appeals upheld the October 2004 trial court decision that found Lanzo Construction Company guilty of a MIOSHA felony in the 1999 workplace fatality of their employee, Robert James Whiteye (People v. Lanzo Construction, No. 260738, 10/17/06).

On May 24, 1999, a crew from Lanzo Construction Company was installing sewer pipe when a cave-in occurred on Lake Ravines Drive in Southfield. Robert James Whiteye, 52, a pipe layer, was pronounced dead at the scene after rescuers worked for several hours to extricate him from the trench.

The fatality occurred in an area of the excavation that was approximately 18 feet deep, with vertical walls, and without any protection to guard against cave-ins. MIOSHA investigated the cavein and found that Lanzo Construction violated the most basic provisions of the MIOSHA trenching standard.

The company received 12 citations alleging willful violations connected to the fatality. Based on provisions in the MIOSH Act, Public Act 154, as amended, every willful violation, which is connected to a fatality, is referred to the Michigan Attorney General’s Office for criminal investigation and/or prosecution.

The appeals court defined “willful” for MIOSHA purposes as requiring only that a defendant either intentionally disregard a MIOSHA requirement or be knowingly and purposely indifferent to a MIOSHA requirement. They rejected the defendant’s claim that “willful” equates to gross negligence under involuntary manslaughter.

The appeals court ruled, “Accordingly, the trial court not only employed the proper definition of willfulness as it relates to MIOSHA violations, there was sufficient evidence to support its conclusions of law on this issue.”

The court also clarified how a corporation could become criminally responsible through the acts of an onsite foreman and superintendent. The court determined that they were “high management official(s),” i.e. those “having supervisory responsibility over the subject matter of the offense and acting within the scope of his employment in behalf of the corporation.” Using this definition, the court determined that Lanzo Construction bore criminal liability for the worker fatality.

The unanimous decision was signed by appellate judges Deborah Servitto, Christopher Murray and Michael Smolenski.

Click here for a complete copy of the Court's decision in pdf format

Source: MIOSHA News



Pathfinder Safety Compliance Products

 OSHA Compliance Seminars  MIOSHA Compliance Seminars
 Biohazard Labels  HazCom Labels
 Bloodborne Compliance Compendium  HazCom Program
 Bloodborne Exposure Control Plan  HazCom Training Materials
 Bloodborne Training Materials  MIOSHA Regulations
 Avian Flu Compliance Compendium  MIOSHA Construction Regulations
 OSHA Regulations  OSHA Construction Regulations



Free Safety Compliance Materials

Free Occupational Safety and Health Publications
 Free MSDS's  Free PowerPoint® Training Programs
 Free OSHA Sample Plans  Free MIOSHA Sample Plans
Safety & Health News

 
     

    

Pathfinder Associates Inc.
P.O. Box 5240
N. Muskegon, MI 49445-0240
Phone: 231-744-8462
Fax: 231-744-0509

Visit our Website: www.pathfndr.com

 OSHA and MIOSHA Compliance.


Copyright 2007 - All rights reserved.
Last updated May 31, 2007